Our Methodology

Research Process

Our comparison methodology is designed to provide neutral, educational information to help users make informed decisions about educational technology platforms.

Data Collection

• We gather information from official websites, documentation, and publicly available resources
• Feature lists are compiled from vendor specifications and user guides
• Pricing information is collected from official pricing pages
• User feedback is aggregated from public reviews and forums

Evaluation Criteria

Each platform is evaluated across consistent criteria:

• Features: Core functionality and capabilities
• Usability: Ease of use and learning curve
• Integration: Compatibility with other tools
• Support: Documentation and customer service
• Pricing: Cost structure and value proposition

Neutrality Standards

We maintain neutrality through:

• No affiliate relationships that could bias our comparisons
• Educational focus rather than promotional content
• Balanced presentation of pros and cons
• Clear disclosure of information sources

Update Process

Our comparisons are updated regularly to reflect:

• New features and platform updates
• Pricing changes
• User feedback and market developments
• Changes in platform availability

Limitations

We acknowledge the limitations of our methodology:

• Information is based on publicly available sources
• Features and pricing may change without notice
• Individual experiences may vary
• We cannot test every feature of every platform